<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum Touch &#8211; Are You a Skeptic or a Believer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer</link>
	<description>How to improve the quality of your life, day by day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elsa</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Elsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m neither a skeptic or believer. I start with interest, and I check - the same as with anything. I&#039;d say I&#039;m more someone with an open mind - which is why I&#039;m here. I listened to an interview with Richard Gordon, found it very interesting - then wanted to know what others have experienced. My next step, I think, is to buy the book. It sounds too interesting to ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m neither a skeptic or believer. I start with interest, and I check &#8211; the same as with anything. I&#8217;d say I&#8217;m more someone with an open mind &#8211; which is why I&#8217;m here. I listened to an interview with Richard Gordon, found it very interesting &#8211; then wanted to know what others have experienced. My next step, I think, is to buy the book. It sounds too interesting to ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-515</guid>
		<description>I do have one quick question about Emily Rose&#039;s experiment.  Personally, because of the issues described, I wouldn&#039;t give it much credence either regardless of the results.  However, when it had such a devastating effect on the field, and the tests would be so easily performed again under more rigorous conditions, why then &quot;to date, there is no published experimental replication or refutation of Emily&#039;s original study. It presently stands alone as a test of TT practitioners&#039; raw ability to detect or manipulate an HEF.&quot;?

If something that was so damaging at the time stands alone as the only test of TT, then why hasn&#039;t it been studied further?  If I were a big proponent, having peer reviewed experimental data that validates the claims I am making would be a huge asset and a benefit to all practitioners, as well as the people it could potentially help.  And if I am such a proponent, I should be confident enough that the results of a rigorous double blind experiment would support my claims.  So my question is, why hasn&#039;t this been done?

Until that question is answered I find it very hard to trust the claims made by the practitioners (and I have tried it myself, as i am always one to try something new!), and I don&#039;t think that&#039;s an unreasonable position to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do have one quick question about Emily Rose&#8217;s experiment.  Personally, because of the issues described, I wouldn&#8217;t give it much credence either regardless of the results.  However, when it had such a devastating effect on the field, and the tests would be so easily performed again under more rigorous conditions, why then &#8220;to date, there is no published experimental replication or refutation of Emily&#8217;s original study. It presently stands alone as a test of TT practitioners&#8217; raw ability to detect or manipulate an HEF.&#8221;?</p>
<p>If something that was so damaging at the time stands alone as the only test of TT, then why hasn&#8217;t it been studied further?  If I were a big proponent, having peer reviewed experimental data that validates the claims I am making would be a huge asset and a benefit to all practitioners, as well as the people it could potentially help.  And if I am such a proponent, I should be confident enough that the results of a rigorous double blind experiment would support my claims.  So my question is, why hasn&#8217;t this been done?</p>
<p>Until that question is answered I find it very hard to trust the claims made by the practitioners (and I have tried it myself, as i am always one to try something new!), and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s an unreasonable position to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lappin</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lappin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Amen brother!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen brother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerber</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,
I agree! Most skeptics never try something new and then it is easy to say something does not work.
I have seen the results and know for myself that it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,<br />
I agree! Most skeptics never try something new and then it is easy to say something does not work.<br />
I have seen the results and know for myself that it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lappin</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lappin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-500</guid>
		<description>If anyone is a skeptic, it is only because they are afraid to try something new or outside the box. 

I&#039;ve been teaching Reiki for nearly 12 years and Quantum-Touch for about 4 years. With Reiki, I really didn&#039;t know what to expect. We would tell our students that it would reduce stress and help relieve pain. But then we started hearing stories about how it help people with a myriad of conditions.

Quantum-Touch only reaffirmed the ability to do healing work. For me, it has taken to a whole new level. I&#039;ve seen a woman&#039;s spine, deformed from scoliosis, and see it become virtually straight within 15 minutes. Even that blew me away. But, it is a testament ot the ability that we all have. We only have to learn to tap into this power and use it to help others and ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is a skeptic, it is only because they are afraid to try something new or outside the box. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been teaching Reiki for nearly 12 years and Quantum-Touch for about 4 years. With Reiki, I really didn&#8217;t know what to expect. We would tell our students that it would reduce stress and help relieve pain. But then we started hearing stories about how it help people with a myriad of conditions.</p>
<p>Quantum-Touch only reaffirmed the ability to do healing work. For me, it has taken to a whole new level. I&#8217;ve seen a woman&#8217;s spine, deformed from scoliosis, and see it become virtually straight within 15 minutes. Even that blew me away. But, it is a testament ot the ability that we all have. We only have to learn to tap into this power and use it to help others and ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum Touch</title>
		<link>http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/2009/06/quantum-touch-are-you-a-skeptic-or-a-believer/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum Touch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everydayimprovement.com/blog/?p=544#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
